Encrypted login | home

Program Information

Evaluation of a Method to Calculate Patient-Oriented MGD Coefficients Using Estimates of Glandular Tissue Distribution

no image available
M Porras-Chaverri

M Porras-Chaverri1,2*, P Galavis3 , P Bakic4 , J Vetter1 , (1)University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, (2) University of Costa Rica, San Jose, Costa Rica, (3) NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, (3) University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

Presentations

TU-F-18C-5 Tuesday 4:30PM - 6:00PM Room: 18C

Purpose:
Evaluate mammographic mean glandular dose (MGD) coefficients for particular known tissue distributions using a novel formalism that incorporates the effect of the heterogeneous glandular tissue distribution, by comparing them with MGD coefficients derived from the corresponding anthropomorphic computer breast phantom.

Methods:
MGD coefficients were obtained using MCNP5 simulations with the currently used homogeneous assumption and the heterogeneously-layered breast (HLB) geometry and compared against those from the computer phantom (ground truth). The tissue distribution for the HLB geometry was estimated using glandularity map image pairs corrected for the presence of non-glandular fibrous tissue. Heterogeneity of tissue distribution was quantified using the glandular tissue distribution index, Idist. The phantom had 5 cm compressed breast thickness (MLO and CC views) and 29% whole breast glandular percentage.

Results:
Differences as high as 116% were found between the MGD coefficients with the homogeneous breast core assumption and those from the corresponding ground truth. Higher differences were found for cases with more heterogeneous distribution of glandular tissue. The Idist for all cases was in the [-0.8⁻+0.3] range.
The use of the methods presented in this work results in better agreement with ground truth with an improvement as high as 105 pp. The decrease in difference across all phantom cases was in the [9⁻105] pp range, dependent on the distribution of glandular tissue and was larger for the cases with the highest Idist values.

Conclusion:
Our results suggest that the use of corrected glandularity image pairs, as well as the HLB geometry, improves the estimates of MGD conversion coefficients by accounting for the distribution of glandular tissue within the breast. The accuracy of this approach with respect to ground truth is highly dependent on the particular glandular tissue distribution studied.

Funding Support, Disclosures, and Conflict of Interest: Predrag Bakic discloses current funding from NIH, NSF, and DoD, former funding from Real Time Tomography, LLC and a current research collaboration with Barco and Hologic.


Contact Email: