|Policy number||Policy name||Policy date||Sunset date|
|PP 16-B||Plagiarism in AAPM Journals||11/28/2012||12/31/2017|
|November 28, 2012 Board Meeting|
The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) does not tolerate plagiarism or any misrepresentation of original work. In support of this position, the Board of Directors and Board of Editors of the AAPM’s journals, Medical Physics and the Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics (JACMP), have adopted the following policies and procedures in response to any accusation of plagiarism.
Plagiarism is defined as “the appropriation or imitation of the language, ideas, and thoughts of another author, and representation of them as one’s original work.” (The Random House Dictionary of the English Language (unabridged)). Plagiarism is a serious breach of ethics that undermines the authenticity of AAPM's journals. Plagiarism violates the literary rights of the original author(s) and the property rights of a copyright holder. A person guilty of plagiarism may be subject to legal action instituted by these individuals.
Upon receipt of a written allegation of plagiarism, the Board of Editors shall examine the original material and the publication alleged to constitute plagiarism. If the evidence suggests that plagiarism has not occurred, the Editor shall so notify the accuser and no further action shall be taken. If the evidence suggests that plagiarism may have occurred, the editor will contact by certified letter the accused author(s), the author(s) whose work may have been plagiarized, and the copyright holder of the original material if different from the author(s). Included in the letter shall be the alleged plagiarizing language, together with a copy of the original and suspected work. If all parties agree that plagiarism (whether intentional or unintentional) has occurred, a written letter of apology shall be sent promptly by the offending author(s) to the editor and to the author(s) and copyright holder whose work has been plagiarized.
Upon receipt of an apology, the editor of the journal shall place a Notice of Plagiarism in the on-line version of the journal that contains the offending publication, and in the next available printed version of the journal. This Notice shall identify the offending publication, the exact text that has been plagiarized, and the original publication from which the plagiarized text was extracted. Further, the offending author(s) shall agree in writing that no further dissemination of the offending publication shall occur without an attending Notice of Plagiarism.
If the author accused of plagiarism denies that plagiarism has occurred, the accusation and all supporting materials shall be referred to the Deputy Editors of the journal, who shall identify 3 additional members of the Board of Editors to join with them in an ad hoc committee to review the accusation and materials. The accused author(s) shall be encouraged by the Editor to submit any additional information that may be relevant to defense against the accusation. Further, the accused author(s) may request in writing,and be granted, a telephone or personal hearing with the ad hoc committee, with the understanding that expenses of the accused author(s) related to the hearing shall be borne by the author(s). The entire review process shall be concluded in no more than 3 months from the time the author(s) deny the charge of plagiarism.
If the ad hoc committee rules in support of the accusation of plagiarism, the process described above for the case where plagiarism is admitted shall be instituted. Further, the ad hoc committee shall decide whether the plagiarism is sufficiently egregious to warrant referral to the AAPM’s Ethics Committee, if the person found guilty of plagiarism is an AAPM member.
If the ad hoc committee rules against the accusation of plagiarism, a letter so stating this ruling shall be provided to the accuser, the author(s) accused of plagiarism, the author(s) of the original work, and the copyright holder if different from the author(s).