2017 AAPM Annual Meeting
Back to session list

Session Title: QA for Modern Radiation Therapy
Question 1: According to AAPM TG-142, quality assurance of medical accelerators should include:
Reference:Klein et al.: Task Group 142 Report: Quality assurance of Medical Accelerators, Med. Phys. 36 (9), 4197-4212 (2009)
Choice A:Dosimetry, mechanical and safety.
Choice B:Imaging.
Choice C:Special devices/procedures.
Choice D:All of the above.
Question 2: Compared with the conventional manual QA processes, which of the following descriptions about autonomous QA processes is right:
Reference:1. Gilmer Valdes, Olivier Morin, Yanisley Valenciaga, Niel Kirby, Jean Pouliot, Cynthia Chuang: Use of TrueBeam developer mode for imaging QA, Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 16 (4), 322-333(2015) 2. Cesare H Jenkins, Dominik J Naczynski, Shu-Jung S Yu, Yong Yang and Lei Xing, Automating quality assurance of digital linear accelerators using a radioluminescent phosphor coated phantom and optical imaging, Phys. Med. Biol. 61, L29-L37 (2016)
Choice A:More efficient, but less accurate.
Choice B:More efficient, but complicated and unstable.
Choice C:More efficient, more stable and accurate.
Choice D:Less efficient, but more stable and accurate.
Question 3: Typically, an autonomous QA process includes:
Reference:1. Gilmer Valdes, Olivier Morin, Yanisley Valenciaga, Niel Kirby, Jean Pouliot, Cynthia Chuang: Use of TrueBeam developer mode for imaging QA, Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 16 (4), 322-333(2015) 2. Cesare H Jenkins, Dominik J Naczynski, Shu-Jung S Yu, Yong Yang and Lei Xing, Automating quality assurance of digital linear accelerators using a radioluminescent phosphor coated phantom and optical imaging, Phys. Med. Biol. 61, L29-L37 (2016)
Choice A:Automatic data acquisition.
Choice B:Automatic data processing.
Choice C:Automatic analysis and reporting.
Choice D:All of the above.
Question 4: The accuracy of Automating QA for mechanical and geometric tests using a radioluminescent phosphor coated phantom and optical imaging could be:
Reference:Cesare H Jenkins, Dominik J Naczynski, Shu-Jung S Yu, Yong Yang and Lei Xing, Automating quality assurance of digital linear accelerators using a radioluminescent phosphor coated phantom and optical imaging, Phys. Med. Biol. 61, L29-L37 (2016)
Choice A:<0.1mm
Choice B:0.1mm~0.2mm
Choice C:~0.5mm
Choice D:1 mm
Question 5: Which QA data storage method is best for future data analysis, mining, and sharing?
Reference:M.Y.Y. Law, B. Liu, L.W. Chan, Informatics in Radiology—DICOM-RT based electronic patient record information system for radiation therapy, Radiographics, 29 (2009), pp. 961–972
Choice A:Portable document format (PDF).
Choice B:Database.
Choice C:Excel spreadsheets.
Choice D:Paper.
Question 6: What benefit does QA protocol standardization provide?
Reference:Santanam, L. et al. Standardizing naming conventions in radiation oncology. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 83, 1344–1349 (2012)
Choice A:Improved communication between multiple clinics.
Choice B:Ensures that efficient QA procedures are being used.
Choice C:Improves data analysis.
Choice D:All of the above.
Question 7: What is a folksonomy?
Reference:Pink, Daniel H. (11 December 2005). "Folksonomy". New York Times. Retrieved 14 July 2009
Choice A:A user generated way of classifying items.
Choice B:A classification method that is controlled by a certain group.
Choice C:A new type of hippie commune.
Choice D:All of the above.
Question 8: The best method to get the structural data from the Mosaiq database (or ARIA database) to an physics chart check program is:
Reference:- Deshan Yang, Yu Wu , Ryan S Brame , Sridhar Yaddanapudi , Dharanipathy Rangaraj , Harold Li , S. Murty Goddu , Sasa Mutic, Electronic chart checks in a paperless radiation therapy clinic, Medical Physics, 2012, 39(8), pp 4726-4732 - Harold Li, Yu Wu, Deshan Yang, Sasa Mutic, Software tool for physics chart checks, Practical Radiation Oncology, 2014, 4(6), e217-25
Choice A:To manual export the data in Mosaiq then import the data into the physics chart check program.
Choice B:The physics chart check program to retrieve data directly from Mosaiq using SQL queries.
Choice C:The physics chart check program to decode the treatment plan PDF documents to extract the treatment plan parameters.
Choice D:To execute a script in Mosaiq to push data to a physics chart check program.
Question 9: Full and semi-automatic physics tools could be useful in:
Reference:- Deshan Yang, Yu Wu , Ryan S Brame , Sridhar Yaddanapudi , Dharanipathy Rangaraj , Harold Li , S. Murty Goddu , Sasa Mutic, Electronic chart checks in a paperless radiation therapy clinic, Medical Physics, 2012, 39(8), pp 4726-4732 - Harold Li, Yu Wu, Deshan Yang, Sasa Mutic, Software tool for physics chart checks, Practical Radiation Oncology, 2014, 4(6), e217-25
Choice A:Physics new start chart check.
Choice B:Physics weekly chart check.
Choice C:Treatment plan parameter check.
Choice D:Physics workflow / task management.
Choice E:All of the above.
Question 10: In the following statements, which one is the most correct?
Reference:- Deshan Yang, Yu Wu , Ryan S Brame , Sridhar Yaddanapudi , Dharanipathy Rangaraj , Harold Li , S. Murty Goddu , Sasa Mutic, Electronic chart checks in a paperless radiation therapy clinic, Medical Physics, 2012, 39(8), pp 4726-4732 - Harold Li, Yu Wu, Deshan Yang, Sasa Mutic, Software tool for physics chart checks, Practical Radiation Oncology, 2014, 4(6), e217-25
Choice A:Automated physics tools can replace medical physicists entirely.
Choice B:Automated physics tools can perform chart check tasks effectively on the tasks that the tools are designed to handle.
Choice C:Automated physics tools can cover >90% of the chart check tasks.
Choice D:Automated physics tools can only cover <10% of the chart check tasks
Back to session list