2018 AAPM Annual Meeting
Back to session list

Session Title: Radiation Dose and Image Quality in Fluoroscopy: Part 2
Question 1: What is the ideal metric for estimating patient dose when deterministic effects are of potential concern?
Reference:National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) Report No. 168 – Radiation Dose Management for Fluoroscopically-Guided Interventional Medical Procedures.
Choice A:Fluoroscopy time
Choice B:Fluoroscopy time and number of images
Choice C:Peak skin dose
Choice D:Dose area product
Choice E:Cumulative reference air kerma
Question 2: Which of the following should be considered when estimating patient skin dose?
Reference:D.R. Bednarek et al. “A tracking system to calculate patient skin dose in real-time,” Med Phys 43 (9), 5131-5144 (2016).
Choice A:Backscatter
Choice B:Patient support attenuation
Choice C:Field size
Choice D:Beam angulation
Choice E:All of the above
Question 3: Which approach is most effective for monitoring and managing clinical radiation dose levels?
Reference:A Kuhls-Gilcrist, “Vascular Imaging for Image-Guided Interventions,” Cardiovascular and Neurovascular Imaging: Physics and Technology, CRC Press, 377-393 (2015).
Choice A:Measurement of reference air kerma rates.
Choice B:Review of protocol settings.
Choice C:Analysis of DICOM Radiation Dose Structured Reports.
Choice D:Annual radiation safety committee meetings.
Question 4: Which of the following sentences is NOT TRUE regarding the use of advanced software that delineates vessels feeding a tumor.
Reference:a true: Cornelis, F. H., et al. 2018 Hepatic Arterial Embolization Using Cone Beam CT with Tumor Feeding Vessel Detection Software: Impact on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response. CVIR 41(1):104-111. b true: Yarmohammadi, H., et al. 2018 Evaluation of the Effect of Operator Experience on Outcome of Hepatic Artery Embolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Tertiary Cancer Center. Acad Radiol. c, d true: Iwazawa J., et al. 2013. Comparison of the number of image acquisitions and procedural time required for transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with and without tumor-feeder detection software. Radiol Res Pract.
Choice A:It may result in improved local tumor response after HCC embolization
Choice B:It has demonstrated better sensitivity to detect tumor feeding vessels compared to standard manual analysis of DSA and reformatted CBCT images
Choice C:It was proven to reduce the number of DSAs needed during liver embolization
Choice D:It was proven to reduce procedure time
Choice E:It was not proven to impact treatment outcome
Question 5: Which of the following sentences is NOT TRUE regarding multimodality fusion:
Reference:Kapoor, Baljendra, and Nikunj Chauhan 2017 Advanced Intraprocedural Imaging Applications in Hepatobiliary Intervention. Digestive Disease Interventions 01(03):155-162.
Choice A:It allows overlaying information from any pre-operative DICOM volume on live fluoroscopy
Choice B:It allows view-only pre-operative CT/MR/PET at the time of the procedure
Choice C:It allows fusing procedure CBCT to pre-procedure volumes to identify target, plan best treatment approach and/or assess treatment coverage.
Choice D:It allows leveraging information provided by different modalities at one single point of care, the IR suite.
Choice E:It allows patient radiation dose reduction.
Question 6: Which of the following best describes the comparison between CBCT – needle guidance software and CT Guidance for Percutaneous Bone Biopsies?
Reference:Tselikas, L., et al. 2015 Percutaneous bone biopsies: comparison between flat-panel cone-beam CT and CT-scan guidance. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 38(1):167-76.
Choice A:CT guidance induces lower dose than CBCT – needle guidance software.
Choice B:Compared with CT-guidance, CBCT - needle guidance software increased bone biopsies accuracy, reducing patient and operator radiation doses.
Choice C:Technical success was higher under CT guidance.
Choice D:Puncture time was significantly lower under CT guidance.
Question 7: In which of the following operation modes, recursive filtering is not beneficial?
Reference:Bushberg JT et al. The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging (3rd Edition). Chapter 9: Fluoroscopy.
Choice A:Low dose mode.
Choice B:Normal dose mode.
Choice C:High-dose/Boost mode.
Choice D:Digital subtraction angiography mode.
Question 8: Many fluoroscopes provide the ability to alert the user of elevated reference air kerma during a procedure. NCRP 168 suggests that the 1st notification alert for reference air kerma be at 3 Gy, with subsequent alerts at:
Reference:National Council on Radiation Protection & Measurements, Report-168 Radiation Dose Management for Fluoroscopically Guided Interventional Medical Procedures. - Table 4.7
Choice A:Each additional 300 Gy cm2.
Choice B:Each additional 2 Gy.
Choice C:Each additional 1 Gy.
Choice D:When you reach 15 Gy.
Question 9: When characterizing and evaluating a new fluoroscope - it is important to understand the 2 typical methods for selection of the spectral filters, which are:
Reference:Functionality and Operation of Fluoroscopic Automatic Brightness Control/Automatic Dose Rate Control Logic in Modern Cardiovascular and Interventional Angiography Systems, TG-125, Med. Phys. 39 (5), May 2012
Choice A:Optical Sampling AGC and Video Sampling AGC methods.
Choice B:Anatomical Program-Based and Seissl methods.
Choice C:SID controlled and kV controlled methods.
Choice D:SEER and EERD methods.
Question 10: A KAP meter with a correction factor of C >1 would indicate that the fluoroscope displayed Ka,r would be:
Reference:Accuracy and calibration of integrated radiation output indicators in diagnostic radiology: A report of the AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 190, Med. Phys. 42 (12), December 2015.
Choice A:Higher than the actual value.
Choice B:Lower than the actual value.
Choice C:Equivalent to the actual value.
Choice D:Better obtained in the RDSR than the DICOM header.
Back to session list