2018 AAPM Annual Meeting
Back to session list

Session Title: Multi-Energy and Multi-Contrast CT Imaging
Question 1: Dual energy CT capability to characterize different materials relies on
Reference:C. McCollough, S. Leng, L. Yu, and J. Fletcher, Dual- and Multi-Energy CT: Principles, Technical Approaches, and Clinical Applications. Radiology, Vol 276 (3), 2015
Choice A:Differences in attenuation properties at different X-ray energies
Choice B:Compton scatter exclusively
Choice C:Material-specific attenuation of the low-energy X-ray spectrum
Choice D:The radiation dose
Question 2: Which of the following statements best describes the role of DECT-material-specific images in oncology is
Reference:Mukta D. Agrawal, Daniella F. Pinho, Naveen M. Kulkarni, Peter F. Hahn, Alexander R. Guimaraes, Dushyant V. Sahani, Oncologic Applications of Dual-Energy CT in the Abdomen, RadioGraphics, Vo 34 (3), 2014
Choice A:Calcium and iodine separation remains difficult due to their almost similar attenuation
Choice B:Material-specific images improve delineation of lesion borders and the assessment of local, vascular and soft tissue invasion
Choice C:Iodine concentration contributes to chemotherapy selection
Choice D:Iodine distribution guides modulation of dose for radiation therapy
Question 3: Which of the following is a potential limitation of DECT-material decomposition?
Reference:Manuel Patino, Andrea Prochowski, Mukta D. Agrawal, Frank J. Simeone, Rajiv Gupta, Peter F. Hahn, Dushyant V. Sahani, Material Separation Using Dual-Energy CT: Current and Emerging Applications. RadioGraphics, Vol 36 (4), 2015
Choice A:The increase in conspicuity of iodine in lesions
Choice B:Energy separation should be minimal to improve material characterization
Choice C:Reliable discrimination of materials with similar atomic number
Choice D:The algorithms generate images with different image texture, leading to longer learning curve during clinical adoption.
Question 4: Which of the following CT scanner platform cannot acquire more than 2 energy spectra within one single scan?
Reference:R. Forghani, B. DeMan, G. Wang, “Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Physical Principles, Approaches to Scanning, Usage, and Implementation: Part 1”, Neuro imag Clin N Am 27 (2017) 371–384. E. Dafni, D. Ruimi, “Multiple source CT scanner”, US Patent 5,966,422, 1999. L. Yu, Z. Li, S. Leng, C. H. McCollough (2016). "Dual-source multi-energy CT with triple or quadruple x-ray beams." Proc SPIE 978312.
Choice A:Multi-kVp imaging by switching the x-ray tube between multiple voltages
Choice B:Dual-layer detector CT
Choice C:Dual-source CT with split filters applied to one or both sources
Choice D:Three-source CT
Question 5: Ideal PCD-CT is supposed to have better noise performance than energy-integrating detector (EID) based MECT techniques for material specific imaging. However, for current PCD-CT technology, the noise in material specific images is comparable to or even worse than that from some of the energy-integrating detector (EID) based MECT techniques, given the same total radiation dose. What is the primary reason?
Reference:S. Faby, S. Kuchenbecker, et al. (2015). "Performance of today's dual energy CT and future multi energy CT in virtual non-contrast imaging and in iodine quantification: A simulation study." Medical physics 42(7): 4349-4366.
Choice A:Spectral overlap in current PCD-CT is comparable to EID-based MECT
Choice B:PCD-CT has a higher spatial resolution than EID-based CT
Choice C:Signal to noise ratio of EID-based CT is better than PCD-CT
Choice D:Signal to noise ratio of EID-based CT is worse than PCD-CT
Question 6: PCDs detect photons and measure their energies using:
Reference:Vision 20/20: Single photon counting x-ray detectors in medical imaging. Taguchi K and Iwanczyk JS. Medical Physics, Vol 40, Issue 10, pp 100901 (19 pages), 2013.
Choice A:Scintillator and photodiode
Choice B:Gas and electrodes
Choice C:Semiconductor-crystal and pulse height comparator in ASIC
Choice D:Image intensifier and CCD camera
Question 7: Potential clinical merit of PCD-CT includes:
Reference:Vision 20/20: Single photon counting x-ray detectors in medical imaging. Taguchi K and Iwanczyk JS. Medical Physics, Vol 40, Issue 10, pp 100901 (19 pages), 2013.
Choice A:Short scan time duration
Choice B:High contrast-to-noise ratio of images
Choice C:Low soft tissue contrast
Choice D:Low system cost
Question 8: Which of the followings is NOT an issue for clinical PCD-CT?
Reference:Vision 20/20: Single photon counting x-ray detectors in medical imaging. Taguchi K and Iwanczyk JS. Medical Physics, Vol 40, Issue 10, pp 100901 (19 pages), 2013.
Choice A:Cost of PCDs
Choice B:Pulse pileups
Choice C:Charge sharing and cross-talks
Choice D:Light output efficiency
Question 9: Which feature is important for the contrast generation of an element in multi-energy CT:
Reference:Si-Mohamed, S.; Bar-Ness, D.; Sigovan, M.; Cormode, D. P.; Coulon, P.; Coche, E.; Vlassenbroek, A.; Normand, G.; Boussel, L.; Douek, P. Review of an initial experience with an experimental spectral photon-counting computed tomography system. Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A 2017, 873, 27-35
Choice A:Their L-edge
Choice B:Their K-edge
Choice C:Double bonds
Choice D:Electronegativity
Question 10: An advantage of multi-energy CT over conventional CT is:
Reference:Dangelmaier, J.; Bar-Ness, D.; Daerr, H.; Muenzel, D.; Si-Mohamed, S.; Ehn, S.; Fingerle, A. A.; Kimm, M. A.; Kopp, F. K.; Boussel, L.; Roessl, E.; Pfeiffer, F.; Rummeny, E. J.; Proksa, R.; Douek, P.; Noel, P. B. Experimental feasibility of spectral photon-counting computed tomography with two contrast agents for the detection of endoleaks following endovascular aortic repair. Eur Radiol 2018.
Choice A:Specific imaging of contrast agents
Choice B:Fewer scans need to be done
Choice C:The ability to distinguish different contrast agents
Choice D:All of the above
Back to session list