2019 AAPM Annual Meeting
Back to session list

Session Title: The Understanding and Courage to Lead - Part 3
Question 1: Johannes Rank and Michael Frese define affect as which of the following?
Reference:Rank, J., & Frese, M. (2008). The impact of emotions, moods, and other affect-related variables on creativity, innovation and initiative in organizations. Research Companion to Emotion in Organizations,(New Horizons in Management Series).
Choice A:Mood.
Choice B:Emotion.
Choice C:Comprising both mood and emotion.
Choice D:Comprising neither mood nor emotion.
Question 2: Johannes Rank and Michael Frese propose affect, either positive or negative, impacts creativity, innovation, and initiative in organizations.
Reference:Rank, J., & Frese, M. (2008). The impact of emotions, moods, and other affect-related variables on creativity, innovation and initiative in organizations. Research Companion to Emotion in Organizations,(New Horizons in Management Series).
Choice A:True
Choice B:False
Question 3: Johannes Rank and Michael Frese use which of the following to define initiative?
Reference:Rank, J., & Frese, M. (2008). The impact of emotions, moods, and other affect-related variables on creativity, innovation and initiative in organizations. Research Companion to Emotion in Organizations,(New Horizons in Management Series).
Choice A:The development of novel and useful ideas, products or problem solutions.
Choice B:The actual intentional implementation of new and beneficial ideas for work products or processes at the individual, group, or organizational level.
Choice C:The work behavior characterized by its self-starting nature, its proactive approach, and by being persistent in overcoming difficulties that arise in the pursuit of a goal.
Choice D:An application of novel ideas that is self-started and beyond formal requirements.
Question 4: Stu Kanrot, Kathy E Kram, and Fabio Sala suggested a model to frame leadership adaptability focuses on which two dimensions?
Reference:Kantor, S., Kram, K. E., & Sala, F. (2008). Change factor: Making the case for executive adaptability. Leadership in Action: A Publication of the Center for Creative Leadership and Jossey‐Bass, 27(6), 8-12. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/lia.1227
Choice A:Ability and confidence.
Choice B:Concern and control.
Choice C:Courage and curiosity.
Choice D:Trust and warmth.
Question 5: According to Guogong Zhu et. al., which of the following describes adaptability?
Reference:Zhu, G., B. Wolff, S., T.(Tim) Hall, D., Las Heras, M., Gutierrez, B., & Kram, K. (2013). Too much or too little? A study of the impact of career complexity on executive adaptability. Career Development International, 18(5), 457-483.
Choice A:The ability to work effectively within a variety of changing situations and with various individuals or groups.
Choice B:The ability to understand and appreciate different and opposing perspectives on an issue.
Choice C:The ability to adapt one’s approach as the requirements of a situation change.
Choice D:The ability to change or accept changes in one’s own organization or job requirements.
Choice E:All of the above.
Question 6: Guogong Zhu et. al., studied the impact of career complexity on executive adaptability and found which of the following?
Reference:Zhu, G., B. Wolff, S., T.(Tim) Hall, D., Las Heras, M., Gutierrez, B., & Kram, K. (2013). Too much or too little? A study of the impact of career complexity on executive adaptability. Career Development International, 18(5), 457-483.
Choice A:Executives who had the experience to serve in an executive assistant role developed higher levels of adaptability.
Choice B:For executives without the executive assistant opportunity, job rotations through different types of roles provided a boost to their adaptability.
Choice C:Three role type changes (e.g. line, staff, or matrix) is optimal.
Choice D:100 months is an optimal time to spend in each role type.
Choice E:All of the above.
Back to session list