Encrypted login | home

Program Information

Measurement of Conical Cone Output Factors for the Varian Edge Linear Accelerator

H Li

H Li1*, S Wang2 , H Zhong3 , J Kim4 , N Wen5 , J Gordon6 , I Chetty7 , (1) Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, (2) Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, (3) Henry Ford Hospital System, Detroit, MI, (4) HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM, Detroit, MI, (5) Henry Ford Health System, West Bloomfield, MI, (6) Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, (7) Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI


SU-E-T-370 Sunday 3:00PM - 6:00PM Room: Exhibit Hall

Purpose:To quantify the impact of detector type, SSD/depth, and intermediate reference on conical cone output factor (OF) measurements for the Varian Edge linac.

Methods:OF’s for 4, 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, 15, and 17.5 mm diameter cones relative to 10cmx10cm field were measured for the 6X FFF and 10X FFF energies, with jaws set to 5cmx5cm. Measurements were performed with an Edge diode (0.8mmx0.8mmx0.03mm WxLxT), stereotatic diode SFD, photon diode, CC01 and pinpoint chambers (2mm diameter for both). 95cm SSD/5cm depth were used in a water tank. For the measurement with diodes, OF’s were cross-referred to CC13 ion chamber measurements with 3cmx3cm field, as recommended, to help mitigate the energy variation in diode response with field size. Results were compared to the representative data from Varian measured with Edge detector. With SFD, OF’s at 98.5cm SSD/1.5cm depth and 90cm SSD/10cm depth were also measured.

Results:OF’s measured with the Edge detector matched within 1.3% (max diff) with the representative data from Varian. For the SFD, OF’s matched within 1.3% for the 4, 5 and 17.5 mm cones and within 3.7% for the other cones. OF’s with photon diode were within 1.3% except for the 4 and 5 mm cones where they were 8.1% and 3.7%, respectively. OF’s for the CC01 and pinpoint chamber deviated up to 36% and 44%, respectively for the 4 mm cone. OF’s after intermediate reference with 3cmx3cm field changed by 3.7% for SFD, 0.8% for photon diode, and 0.6% for Edge detector. OF’s at 98.5cm SSD/1.5cm depth were 10.8% higher than that at 95cm SSD/5cm depth, and OF’s at 90cm SSD/1.5cm depth were 7.5% lower.

Conclusion:OF’s measured with the Edge detector appear to be reliable. CC01 and pinpoint chambers do not appear suitable for measuring the small cone OF’s. SSD/depth affects OF measurements significantly.

Contact Email: