Encrypted login | home

Program Information

Impact of Arterial Input Function Selection and T10 Correction On DCE-MRI Tumour Response Prediction Using Compared to Volumetric DCE CT

no image available
C Coolens

C Coolens*, B Driscoll , W Foltz , C Chung , Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON

Presentations

SU-D-303-2 (Sunday, July 12, 2015) 2:05 PM - 3:00 PM Room: 303


Purpose: To evaluate the impact of individualized magnitude and phase signal arterial input function (AIF) measurements as well as voxel-based pre-contrast T10 relaxation on tumour perfusion metrics from DCE-MRI compared to DCE-CT using a common 4D temporal dynamic analysis (TDA) method.

Methods: Nine patients with 13 brain metastases underwent volumetric DCE-CT (Toshiba, Aquilion ONE) and DCE-MRI (IMRIS 3T Verio) at baseline then 7 and 21 days post-radiosurgery. Voxel-based whole brain TDA was performed on all data using in-house software producing kinetic parameters AUC, Ktrans, Kep, and Vb (using the Modified Tofts model). AIF susceptibility was investigated in DCE-CT by selecting the AIF (from internal carotid artery) or VIF (from Sagittal Sinus). In DCE-MRI an individual Magnitude or Phase-based AIF (Sagittal Sinus) was compared to population-based AIF together with susceptibility to voxel-based T10 maps instead of a constant of 2400 msec. Absolute DCE-MRI values were compared to DCE-CT by Pearson correlation.

Results: No significant difference in median Ktrans (0.048 +/- 0.03 s-1) or AUC (2785.5 +/- 1143.6 HU.s) was found between individual AIF and VIF-based DCE CT analyses. Using individual Magnitude VIF or Phase-based AIF for DCE-MRI (T10 2400 ms) resulted in higher Ktrans values (0.181 +/- 0.11 vs. 0.121 +/- 0.099 s-1). This is likely resulting from the smaller AIF peak since the population AIF (which more closely resembles CT) correlates better to DCE-CT metrics. Using voxel-based T10 maps caused further statistically-significant increase in Ktrans and AUC (p<0.0006) that could be contributed to a lower median T10 value (1572 +/- 594, n=41).

Conclusion: This preliminary data highlights the stability of DCE-CT calculations as well as susceptibility of DCE-MRI Ktrans measurements to various imaging factors, including AIF selection and T10 values used for modeling. Efforts to improve voxel-based T10 map calculations are being explored to further explain discrepancies between analysis methods.

Funding Support, Disclosures, and Conflict of Interest: Brain Tumor Foundation of Canada and Ontario Institute of Cancer Research


Contact Email: