Encrypted login | home

Program Information

Impact of VMAT Dose Calculations with Respiratory Movements in Lung

no image available
K Komatsu

K Komatsu1*, F Araki2 , T Ohno2 , Y Shimohigashi3 , R Onizuka1 , (1) Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, (2) Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, (3) Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Kumamoto

Presentations

SU-F-T-541 (Sunday, July 31, 2016) 3:00 PM - 6:00 PM Room: Exhibit Hall


Purpose: To evaluate dose impact due to respiratory movements for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in lung, using deformation technique.

Methods: The dose impact due to respiratory movements was evaluated for VMAT in lung. VMAT dose distributions were calculated with 4D-CT images for a 3-D dynamic lung phantom and seven patients. First, one-arc VMAT dose distributions were calculated at the reference phase (the maximum of expiratory phase) using the Varian Eclipse (ver.10) treatment planning system. All VMAT were planned with 48Gy for 4 fractions. The VMAT dose distributions were divided into 88 control points (CPs) and were assigned to each one of ten phases divided through one respiratory cycle time. Next, the dose distributions were recalculated at each phase and were deformed at the reference phase using DIRART ver.1.0a and Velocity AI ver.3.1 software. The deformed dose distributions were summed up. Finally, VMAT dose distributions with respiratory movements were evaluated from dose volume histograms (DVHs).

Results: VMAT dose distributions deformed by DIRART and the Velocity AI in the phantom study agreed within 2% with that of the reference phase for 95% of GTV (Dā‚‰ā‚…). In the patient study, deformed VMAT dose distributions decreased up to 4.15% and 3.46% for DIRART and Velocity AI, respectively. The maximum dose of GTV (Dmax) tended to be higher with increasing tumor movements. In constant, Dā‚‰ā‚… for DVHs decreased with increasing tumor movements. The discrepancy in the VMAT dose distributions deformed by two software depended on specific properties of respective algorithms and parameters.

Conclusion: Respiratory movements impact on the dose distributions for GTV. The Dmax may relate with amplitude of tumor movements.



Contact Email: