Program Information
Measurement of Equilibrium Doses in Computed Tomography: Comparative Study of Ionization and Solid-State Dosimeters
K Matsubara1*, A Kobayashi1 , M Kobayashi2 , K NOTO3 , K Koshida1 , (1) Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan, (2) Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan, (3) Kanazawa university hospital, Kanazawa, Japan
Presentations
SU-G-IeP2-11 (Sunday, July 31, 2016) 4:30 PM - 5:00 PM Room: ePoster Theater
Purpose: This study aimed to compare equilibrium doses in computed tomography (CT) obtained from ionization and solid-state dosimeters based on the approach presented in the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Report No. 111. The equilibrium doses were also compared with the CT dose index (CTDI) using a 10-cm pencil-type ionization chamber.
Methods: A 0.6-cm³ ionization chamber (10X6-0.6CT) and a solid-state detector (CT Dose Profiler [CTDP]) were calibrated using 80–130 kVp X-ray beams (44.5–55.8 keV of effective energy) from a radiography X-ray machine against a reference ionization dosimeter. Three 16- or 32-cm diameter polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantoms were assembled consecutively on the CT table to obtain equilibrium doses. The 10X6-0.6CT and CTDP were each placed at the center and peripheral holes (12, 3, 6, and 9 o’clock) of the z-center. Central and mean peripheral equilibrium doses were obtained by scanning with longitudinal translation for a length less than the entire phantom length. CTDIs were also obtained with a 10-cm pencil-type ionization chamber (10X6-0.6CT) by scanning a 16- or 32-cm diameter PMMA phantom with one rotation of the X-ray tube.
Results: The difference of calibration coefficients between 80 and 130 kVp was 21.1% for the CTDP and 0.7% for the 10X6-0.6CT. The equilibrium doses were higher than the CTDI. Especially at the peripheral positions and 80 kVp, the 10X6-0.6CT showed higher equilibrium doses than CTDP. However, the relation between the equilibrium dose for the 10X6-0.6CT and the CTDP differed depending on the phantom size, scanner type, measurement position, and selected acquisition parameters.
Conclusions: The use of a 10-cm pencil-type ionization chamber causes underestimation of the equilibrium dose. The CTDP has a higher energy dependency than the 10X6-0.6CT. The obtained equilibrium doses are different between the 10X6-0.6CT and the CTDP depending on various conditions.
Funding Support, Disclosures, and Conflict of Interest: This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 15K09887.
Contact Email: