Encrypted login | home

Program Information

Toward Automated MR-Only Planning of the Brain: Organ-At-Risk Segmentation

no image available
E Orasanu

E Orasanu1*, C Glide-Hurst2 , T Stehle1 , C Buerger1 , S Renisch1 , (1) Philips GmbH InnovativeTechnologies, Hamburg, Hamburg, (2) Henry Ford Health System, Farmington Hills, MI

Presentations

SU-K-708-16 (Sunday, July 30, 2017) 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM Room: 708


Purpose: Recent developments in synthetic CTs (synCTs) derived from MR data have enabled MR-only treatment planning of the brain to become more feasible. However, efficient and automated segmentation is still an unmet need. We aim at developing an automated model-based organ at risk (OAR) segmentation to support MR-only brain treatment planning.

Methods: Twelve primary and metastatic brain cancer patients (5 post-surgical) underwent both CT-SIM and 1.0T MR-SIM (usual clinical protocol including T1w and T2w scans with resolutions of 0.9x0.9/1.25mm³ and 0.7x0.7.2.5mm³ respectively) within 1 week. Shape models were derived as triangle-based meshes for the skull, hemispheres, brainstem, optical nerves, globes, lenses and chiasm from the physician-delineated contours. Using a previously validated model-based segmentation framework, the brain model was trained for adaptation to both T1- and T2-weighted images separately. Once trained, the segmentation is fully automatic using a Generalized Hough Transform initialization. Segmentation performance was assessed by computing the distance between the clinical contours and the automatic segmentation result.

Results: For the brainstem, we found a mean distance of 0.69mm/0.63mm between the clinical delineations and our segmentation on T1-w and T2-w images respectively (q95 1.83mm T1/ 1.68mm T2). For the optic model (lenses, optical nerves, lenses and chiasm) the mean distance was 0.66/0.73 mm (q95 1.79/1.94) on the T1-/T2-w images.For the optic system, the segmentation performs slightly better on T1-w than T2-w, which is also supported by a feature response analysis of the training and better resolution of the T1-w images.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated the feasibility of developing automated OAR segmentation for MR-only brain treatment planning. Our results highlight the importance of acquiring data with high resolution to improve autosegmentation accuracy. Future work will include using a broader database, explore other sites such as head and neck. Overall, the work is promising for implementation in synthetic CT and MR-only workflows.

Funding Support, Disclosures, and Conflict of Interest: E.Orasanu, T.Stehle, C.Buerger, S.Renisch are employees of PhilipsGmbH InnovativeTechnologies, Hamburg,Germany. Research supported by the NCI of NIH under Award#R01CA204189. Content is solely the responsibility of authors and does not necessarily represent official views of NIH. C.Glide-Hurst acknowledges funding from an HFHS Internal Mentored Grant and research agreements with Philips Healthcare.


Contact Email: