2019 AAPM Annual Meeting
Back to session list

Session Title: ISMRM-AAPM Joint Symposia: MR Safety for Experts
Question 1: The translational force on a ferromagnetic object is usually greatest at:
Reference:The physics of MRI safety. Panych LP, Madore B, J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Jan;47(1):28-43
Choice A:Magnet isocenter where the magnetic field is highest and most uniform
Choice B:Scanner 5 Gauss line, which is why access to this area must be tightly controlled
Choice C:Entrance to the bore of magnet where spatial gradient of magnetic field is greatest
Choice D:Point during imaging when the encoding gradients are turned on
Question 2: Which of the following is not an acceptable safety label for a device in the MR environment per ASTM Standard F2503?
Reference:Standards for medical devices in MRI: present and future. Woods TO, J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Nov;26(5):1186-9.
Choice A:MR Safe
Choice B:MR Compatible
Choice C:MR Unsafe
Choice D:MR Conditional
Question 3: The vendor-provided MR conditions for SAR state: Maximum whole-body averaged specific absorption rate (SAR) of 2-W/kg for 15 minutes of scanning. To comply with these MR conditions:
Reference:Standards for medical devices in MRI: present and future. Woods TO, J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Nov;26(5):1186-9.
Choice A:the patient may be scanned for 7.5 minutes at 4-W/kg
Choice B:the patient exam must be limited to 15 minutes
Choice C:each series should be limited to 15 minutes
Choice D:First Level Operating Mode is in effect
Question 4: The primary safety concern regarding the long metallic guidewires, such as those made of Nitinol, used in image-guided vascular procedures is:
Reference:MR-Guided Intravascular Interventions: Technique and Applications. Bock M & Whacker FK, JMRI 2008.
Choice A:increased torque during rapid imaging
Choice B:artifacts obscuring crucial anatomy
Choice C:excessive heating during imaging
Choice D:there are no safety issues with Nitinol in the MR environment
Question 5: Safety concerns during MR-guided interventional and intraoperative procedures performed under anesthesia include:
Reference:ACR Guidance Document on MR Safe Practices: 2013. Kanal et. al. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 37:501-530 (2013)
Choice A:inability for patients to report sensations or pain in the MR environment
Choice B:ability to rapidly remove the patient from Zone IV in case of an emergency
Choice C:proper set up of patient, RF coils and conductors needed to monitor the patient
Choice D:all of the above
Question 6: The use of MR Unsafe devices in the interventional MRI suite is:
Reference:Intraoperative and interventional MRI: Recommendations for a safe environment, Kettenbach J, et al, Minimally Invasive Therapy 2006
Choice A:always prohibited
Choice B:acceptable if the nurse indicates it is needed
Choice C:manageable through policy, procedure & testing
Choice D:a reduced concern in multi-room suites
Choice E:a & b only
Choice F:c & d only
Question 7: Level 2 personnel have which of the following tasks in an MRI environment?
Reference:ACR Guidance Document on MR Safe Practices: 2013. Kanal et. al. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 37:501-530 (2013)
Choice A:MR safety screening
Choice B:Ensuring safety of non-MR personnel in Zones III and IV
Choice C:Restricting access to Zone IV
Choice D:All of the above
Question 8: A physician wants to deliver magnetic resonance guided radiation therapy on a 0.35T MR-linac to a pancreatic cancer patient. As the Level 2 MRI personnel, you found that the MR Safety Screening has discovered that the patient has a Class II implant of a deep brain stimulator. What is the best next step for you to take?
Reference:ACR Guidance Document on MR Safe Practices: 2013. Kanal et. al. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 37:501-530 (2013)
Choice A:Treat the patient because the implant is far from the cancer treatment site
Choice B:Do not treat the patient
Choice C:Determine the implant make and model
Choice D:Convert the results from 1.5T testing conditions over to 0.35T and treat the patient
Question 9: On ultra-high field scanners, the upper limit for the 10g average specific absorption rate (SAR) for scanning the knee in First Level Controlled mode is:
Reference:SAR Simulations & Safety. Fiedler TM, Ladd ME, Bitz AK. Neuroimage. 2018;168:33-58
Choice A:2 W/kg
Choice B:4 W/kg
Choice C:10 W/kg
Choice D:40 W/kg
Question 10: Compared to lower fields (≤ 3T), vestibular activation at ultra-high fields is more severe due to:
Reference:Vestibular stimulation by magnetic fields. Ward BK et al. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015; 1343(1): 69-79
Choice A:subject movement through the larger magnetic field gradients when entering the magnet
Choice B:subject exposure to the large static B0 field when stationary at isocenter
Choice C:increased voltages induced in the inner ear via the Faraday effect
Choice D:A and C only
Choice E:B and C only
Choice F:A and B only
Back to session list