2022 AAPM 64th Annual Meeting
Back to session list

Session Title: Cardiac Radioablation: Expanding Access Across Many Centers via Outreach and Collaboration
Question 1: Which of the following is true for respiratory gating in cardiac radioabaltion?
Reference:Prusator, M., Samson, p.,Cammin, J., Goddu, S.,Moore, K., & Hugo, G. (2021). Evaluation of Motion Compensation Methods for Noninvasive Cardiac Radioablation of Ventricular Tachycardia. International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics, 111(4), 1023-1032
Choice A:The ICD leads are the perfect surrogate for the target for all patients.
Choice B:A breathehold will freeze target motion and there is no need to account for target motion
Choice C:The diaphragm can be used as another perfect surrogate for the target for all patients
Choice D:Cardiac and respiratory motion are complex and should both be assessed on a patient-by-patient basis before considering gating based on a surrogate as the correlation to target motion varies significantly between patients, surrogates, and motion type.
Question 2: The biggest improvement in the sparing of Heart – ITV was achieved by?
Reference:Knutson, N, Samson, P., Hugo, G., Hilliard, J, Cuculich, P. & Robinson, C. (2019).Radiation Therapy Workflow and Dosimetric Analysis from a Phase ½ Trial of Noninvasive Cardiac Radioablation for Ventricular Tachycardia. International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics, 104(5), 1114-1123.
Choice A:Adding more Arcs
Choice B:Using 18X
Choice C:Machine Learning
Choice D:Continual process review which identified early patients were not optimizing on the heart minus ptv, which lead to a process change of adding the heart minus ITV to the optimizer for all patients moving forward.
Question 3: Target definition for cardiac radioablation of ventricular tachycardia requires which of the following pieces of information?
Reference:Suzanne Lydiard, P., Blanck, O., Hugo, G., O’Brien, R., & Keall, P. (2021). A review of cardiac radioablation (CR) for arrhythmias: procedures, technology, and future opportunities. International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics, 109(3), 783-800.
Choice A:Anatomical scar imaging, electrophysiological information
Choice B:Anatomical scar imaging, Metabolic imaging
Choice C:Anatomical scar imaging, CT imaging
Choice D:Metabolic imaging, electrophysiological
Question 4: Clinical data on cardiac radioablation for ventricular tachycardia has generally shown what patient outcomes?
Reference:van der Ree, M. H., Blanck, O., Limpens, J., Lee, C. H., Balgobind, B. V., Dieleman, E. M., ... & Postema, P. G. (2020). Cardiac radioablation—A systematic review. Heart Rhythm, 17(8), 1381-1392.
Choice A:Cessation of VT
Choice B:Reduction in VT burden
Choice C:Increased ICD shocks
Choice D:Disruption of atrial fibrillation
Question 5: Which is NOT a challenge of target delineation for cardiac radioablation for a radiation oncologist?
Reference:Brownstein K, Afzal M, Okabe T, Harfi TT, Tong MS, Thomas E, Hugo G, Cuculich, P, Robinson C, Williams TM. (2021) Method and atlas to enable targeting for cardiac radioablation employing the American Heart Association segmented model. IJROBP 111(1)178-185.
Choice A:Visualization of the heart in different coordinate systems than electrophysiologists
Choice B:Minimal experience with the granular details of cardiac substructures
Choice C:Clearly delineated scar is always visible on CT simulation images*
Choice D:Arbitrary boundaries between the AHA segments
Question 6: Which is NOT true regarding in treatment planning and delivery for cardiac radioablation?
Reference:Suzanne Lydiard, P., Blanck, O., Hugo, G., O’Brien, R., & Keall, P. (2021). A review of cardiac radioablation (CR) for arrhythmias: procedures, technology, and future opportunities. International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics, 109(3), 783-800.
Choice A:Proximity to adjacent organs at risk must be considered
Choice B:Strategies to account for motion management must be considered
Choice C:There are clear dose constraints for all intracardiac structures
Choice D:The literature to date described many different types software/technology for cardiac radioablation treatment planning and delivery
Back to session list