Encrypted login | home

Program Information

Evolution of Radiation Treatment Planning

L Rothenberg

R Mohan

J Van Dyk

B Fraass

T Bortfeld

R Mohan

L Rothenberg1*, R Mohan2*, J Van Dyk3*, B Fraass4*, T Bortfeld5*, (1) Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, (2) UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, (3) Western University, London, ON, (4) Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, (5) Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA


WE-G-16A-1 Wednesday 4:30PM - 6:00PM Room: 16A

Welcome and Introduction - Lawrence N. Rothenberg

This symposium is one a continuing series of presentations at AAPM Annual Meetings on the historical aspects of medical physics, radiology, and radiation oncology that have been organized by the AAPM History Committee. Information on previous presentations including "Early Developments in Teletherapy" (Indianapolis 2013), "Historical Aspects of Cross-Sectional Imaging" (Charlotte 2012), "Historical Aspects of Brachytherapy" (Vancouver 2011), "50 Years of Women in Medical Physics" (Houston 2008), and "Roentgen's Early Investigations" (Minneapolis 2007) can be found in the Education Section of the AAPM Website. The Austin 2014 History Symposium will be on “Evolution of Radiation Treatment Planning.”

Overview - Radhe Mohan

Treatment planning is one of the most critical components in the chain of radiation therapy of cancers. Treatment plans of today contain a wide variety of sophisticated information conveying the potential clinical effectiveness of the designed treatment to practitioners. Examples of such information include dose distributions superimposed on three- or even four-dimensional anatomic images; dose volume histograms, dose, dose-volume and dose-response indices for anatomic structures of interest; etc. These data are used for evaluating treatment plans and for making treatment decisions.
The current state-of-the-art has evolved from the 1940s era when the dose to the tumor and normal tissues was estimated approximately by manual means. However, the symposium will cover the history of the field from the late-1950’s, when computers were first introduced for treatment planning, to the present state involving the use of high performance computing and advanced multi-dimensional anatomic, functional and biological imaging, focusing only on external beam treatment planning. The symposium will start with a general overview of the treatment planning process including imaging, structure delineation, assignment of dose requirements, consideration of uncertainties, selection of beam configurations and shaping of beams, and calculations, optimization and evaluation of dose distributions. This will be followed by three presentations covering the evolution of treatment planning, which parallels the evolution of computers, availability of advanced volumetric imaging and the development of novel technologies such as dynamic multi-leaf collimators and online image-guidance. This evolution will be divided over three distinct periods – prior to 1970’s, the 2D era; from 1980 to the mid-1990’s, the 3D era; and from the mid 1990’s to today, the IMRT era.

When the World was Flat: The Two-Dimensional Radiation Therapy Era” - Jacob Van Dyk

In the 2D era, anatomy was defined with the aid of solder wires, special contouring devices and projection x-rays. Dose distributions were calculated manually from single field, flat surface isodoses on transparencies. Precalculated atlases of generic dose distributions were produced by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Massive time-shared main frames and mini-computers were used to compute doses at individual points or dose distributions in a single plane. Beam shapes were generally rectangular, with wedges, missing tissue compensators and occasional blocks to shield critical structures. Dose calculations were measurement-based or they used primary and scatter calculations based on scatter-air ratio methodologies. Dose distributions were displayed on line printers as alpha-numeric character maps or isodose patterns made with pen plotters.

More than Pretty Pictures: 3D Treatment Planning and Conformal Therapy - Benedick A. Fraass

The introduction of computed tomography allowed the delineation of anatomy three-dimensionally and, supported partly by contracts from the National Cancer Institute, made possible the introduction and clinical use of 3D treatment planning, leading to development and use of 3D conformal therapy in the 1980’s. 3D computer graphics and 3D anatomical structure definitions made possible Beam’s Eye View (BEV) displays, making conformal beam shaping and much more sophisticated beam arrangements possible. These conformal plans significantly improved target dose coverage as well as normal tissue sparing. The use of dose volume histograms, gross/clinical/planning target volumes, MRI and PET imaging, multileaf collimators, and computer-controlled treatment delivery made sophisticated planning approaches practical. The significant improvements in dose distributions and analysis achievable with 3D conformal therapy made possible formal dose escalation and normal tissue tolerance clinical studies that set new and improved expectations for improved local control and decreasing complications in many clinical sites.

From the Art to the State of the Art: Inverse Planning and IMRT - Thomas R. Bortfeld

While the potential of intensity modulation was recognized in the mid-1980’s, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) did not become a reality until the mid-1990’s. Broad beams of photons could be sub-divided into narrow beamlets whose intensities could be determined using sophisticated optimization algorithms to appropriately balance tumor dose with normal tissue sparing. The development of dynamic multi-leaf collimators (on conventional linear accelerators as well as in helical delivery devices) enabled the efficient delivery of IMRT. The evolution of IMRT planning is continuing in the form of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and through advanced optimization tools, such as multi-criteria optimization, automated IMRT planning, and robust optimization to protect dose distributions against uncertainties. IMRT also facilitates “dose painting” in which different sub-volumes of the target are prescribed different doses. Clearly, these advancements are being made possible by the increasing power and lower cost of computers and developments in other fields such as imaging and operations research.

Summary - Radhe Mohan

The history does not end here. The advancement of treatment planning is expected to continue, leading to further automation and improvements in conformality and robustness of dose distributions, particularly in the area of particle therapy. Radiobiological modeling will gain emphasis as part of the planning process.

Learning Objectives:
1. The scope of changes in technology and the capabilities of radiation treatment planning
2. The impact of these changes in the quality of treatment plans and optimality of dose distributions
3. The impact of development in other fields (imaging, computers, operations research, etc.) on the evolution of radiation treatment planning


Contact Email: