AAPM Journal Procedures and Guidelines
  
	
		
		  
            
	
		
			| Policy number | Policy name | Policy date | Sunset date | 
						
	
			
		
			| PUB 2-C | Standard Operating Procedure for proffered and invited submissions of Review Articles | 5/1/2025 | 5/1/2028 | 
		
			| Policy source | 
		
			|  | 
		
			| Policy text | 
		
			| A Review Article is an authoritative review of a subject important to the field of Medical Physics and JACMP. A review article proposal must contain the following TWO elements:
 
 1. Rationale
 This is an explanation as to why an article is called for at this time, and who should be writing it. It should include a brief literature review of the most important 5-10 references in the field.
 It should address
 
 
	Why is a review article on the current topic important?Why is it timely?Are there seminal papers and/or review articles in the field already?Who are the most qualified referees?Describe the authors’ background(s) and expertise on the proposed topic 2. Outline
 An abstract of the proposed article along with a sufficiently detailed table of contents enabling the reviewers to determine what is covered and at what depth.
 
 Assessment criteria for proposals of Review articles:
 
 
 
	Should address a broad audience – should be accessible to a non-specialist as an introduction to the topic, amenable to being presented as a lecture, brings the reader to the current state of the art and identifies the major thrusts for future work.Should provide Conclusions that are insightful and novel and that add to the perspectives already published in the articles being reviewed 
 Criteria for Article topics For an emerging field without an existing Review Article
 
 Should be a catalyst for the emergence of a new line of thinking which is otherwise fragmented.
 For an established sub-field which has existing authoritative Review Article(s), authors must present a compelling case for the novelty and need for a new review vehicle. Valid grounds include
 
 
	Can be in areas of Medical Physics or JACMP more broadly defined (i.e. currently outside those normally covered in the Journal) so as to bring new readers to the journal.Existing material is dated, incomplete or confusedExisting material incomplete or confusedExisting material too specialised and/or inaccessible to Medical Physics readersExisting material does not contain sufficient Medical Physics or JACMP relevant material with either Clinical or Research focus. | 
			
										
	  
 
		Return to AAPM Journal Procedures and Guidelines